Why do some argue that the US government planned 9/11, while others say that 9/11 was an actual terrorist attack, but the government had prior knowledge and allowed it to happen?
Why do some claim explosives were planted in the towers while others claim space lasers, nukes in the basement, etc?
How do you plant explosives in the towers, which require months of preparation? Including tearing apart walls to place charges, removing extraneous material from the building, laying miles of carefully measured detonation cord, and intentionally damaging support columns? They were also bombed in 1993, meaning there were routine checks from bomb squads, including sniffer dogs. Not only would these explosives have to be laid at night in secret, but they would also somehow be able to beat animals specially trained to detect them. You cannot secretly prepare a controlled demolition of the two World Trade Centre buildings, which contain 50,000 workers, plus extensive security systems and guards working around the clock, without anyone noticing anything unusual.
Why do some claim that the planes were holograms while others claim that there was a 5th plane?
Why would you bother with bombs in addition to hijacked aircraft or vice versa?
How is the US government competent enough to pull off 9/11 while also leaving "obvious evidence" trails in freely available stock footage?
Why go to all the trouble of planning 9/11 as a pretext for invading Iraq, when it would have been far easier to fake the discovery of an Iraqi nuclear weapons program?
If 9/11 was a pretext for invading Iraq, why not have Iraqi hijackers?